EXPERT Q&A
Political representatives from both the Republican and Democratic factions have predominantly chosen a route of silence as President Donald Trump nears the 100-day milestone in his administration on April 30.
The Trump administration has introduced a variety of policy transformations—from immigration to tariffs—yet, significantly, many politicians, particularly Democrats, have not exhibited a considerable wave of opposition, asserts University of Michigan specialist Jonathan Hanson from the Ford School of Public Policy.
What is your evaluation of the two political parties?
The barrage of executive actions unleashed by the Trump administration resembles nothing we’ve experienced in our past. The tactic is to overwhelm the opposition with the vastness and boldness of these initiatives. Numerous orders evidently surpass the constitutional powers allocated to the president. Trump is essentially challenging Congress and the judiciary to intervene.
So far, Democratic leaders have not orchestrated a unified response. They may have differing strategies, with some intent on fighting with every resource at their disposal while others believe they can afford to wait, allowing Trump to undermine himself through his own decisions. Concurrently, Republicans who support constitutional governance are similarly remaining quiet. A number of them admit to fearing retribution from Trump and his supporters.
Signs of opposition are beginning to emerge, likely fueled by the economic repercussions from the tumultuous execution of Trump’s tariffs and an increasing awareness of the administration’s other activities.
How do politicians who previously opposed Trump align their actions now? A notable case is Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, who visited the White House earlier this month.
It’s a tricky equation for governors, universities, law firms, and similar entities. The administration utilizes federal authority and funds to reward cooperation and punish noncompliance. Whitmer approached the president seeking backing for matters on our state’s agenda, placing her in an unwinnable position.
As we see more candidates declare for midterm elections, how soon should political parties intensify their efforts?
The midterms are still a considerable distance away, especially given the unfolding constitutional and economic crises. Democrat mobilization should not be about strategizing for 2026, but rather about forming a unified opposition with strong messaging at this moment. This is not routine politics.
How are Republican voters reacting during the initial phases of Trump’s second term?
I anticipate a broad spectrum of opinions, from the staunch supporters to those who appreciate the general policy concepts but feel Trump is overreaching, to those who find it incomprehensible what Trump has done to the party. The current GOP is truly unrecognizable compared to Ronald Reagan’s party, which confronted Russia, advocated for free trade, and portrayed America as a beacon of hope welcoming immigrants.
What effect will the subdued actions of the Democratic Party have on energizing its base and influencing its platform moving forward?
Democratic voters desire someone to advocate for them. There is profound indignation regarding the direction Trump is steering the nation, and Democratic representatives should be cognizant of this. If they fail to take action, their supporters will seek alternatives. They must go beyond merely expecting to win in 2026 due to anger toward Trump. They need to present a clear and constructive alternative agenda.